Episode Transcript

Do I Really Have to Pay Taxes?
Episode 89: April 22, 2009

Hello, and welcome to Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful Life. I’m your host, Adam Freedman.

But first, your daily dose of legalese: This podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship with any listener. In other words, although I am a lawyer, I’m not your lawyer. In fact, we barely know each other. If you need personalized legal advice, contact an attorney in your community.

Today, with the memory of April 15 still fresh, we take a look at Taxes.

Do I Really Have to Pay Taxes?

When you filed your tax return this year, did you hear a little voice asking “is this really necessary?” If so, you’re not alone. Brandon from Louisiana asks:

Is there a law stating that I have to pay federal income taxes?  If so, where is it in writing?

Well done, Brandon – it’s time that somebody had the nerve to ask that question. And I’m glad it wasn’t me. I think I can shed some light on this topic, even though the short answer is if you earn income, you probably have to pay federal income tax.

Before I go any further, I’m happy to tell you that this podcast is sponsored by Go To My PC. I hear people say they feel chained to their office computer spending hours stuck in traffic just to get to their office PC, also staying late at the office, never having enough time for family and friends! If this sounds like your life, try GoToMyPC. It lets you take your office with you wherever you go! So you can be productive from home or anywhere. Simply log on to GoToMyPC.com and your office desktop instantly appears. Use any program, work on any file, check e-mail, access network resources. I use GoToMyPC and I love it! You can try GoToMyPC FREE for 30-days. But you must visit go to my pc dot com slash podcast That’s GoToMyPC.com/podcast for a FREE 30 day trial

This Code’s No DaVinci

Back to the issue.

Brandon: the obligation to pay federal tax is, in fact, written down. It’s called… the Tax Code! To be exact, it’s the Internal Revenue Code, which is Title 26 of the United States Code. Granted, the bit about individuals having to pay tax is buried in section . . ., well, it’s actually in the very first section of the Code. But hey, who besides a lawyer has a copy of the US Code handy?

Generally, if your gross income exceeds a certain level – and the level depends on your age and marital status – you will have to file a tax return. More information is available on the IRS website, and you’ll want to consult with an accountant if you have questions about your tax status.

Avoiding or Evading?

Now, nobody likes paying taxes, but there’s an important distinction to be made. One the one hand, there’s “tax avoidance,” which is the strategy of reducing your tax bill as much as legally possible. There’s nothing wrong that – that’s what people pay CPAs for. But then there’s “tax evasion,” which is the deliberate flouting of tax laws. Tax evasion can expose you to criminal and civil liability.

The problem is that there are many strategies for tax evasion masquerading as lawful tax avoidance. People dress them up in creative legal arguments hoping to get some judge to buy it. Basically, it never works, but the arguments are amusing so I’ll share some with you.

Is the Income Tax Unconstitutional?

For example, some people argue that the Internal Revenue Code is unconstitutional because of Article One’s requirement that “direct taxes” be apportioned among the states on the basis of population, rather than on the basis of individual income. The only tiny flaw in this argument is that the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1913, specifically grants Congress the power to tax individual incomes without any apportionment. Over the years countless tax protestors have tried to persuade federal judges that the Sixteenth Amendment was not properly ratified, but such arguments are routinely tossed out of court.

What About the Old Unlawful Money Argument?

Another perennial loser is the argument that the tax code doesn’t apply because the prevailing form of currency in the US – Federal Reserve Notes – is not lawful money. In 1980, for example, a Kansas man named Gary Rickman declared that he had no taxable income whatsoever, despite the fact that he had admittedly been employed as a mathematics instructor at a community college. At his trial, Rickman explained that his income was zero “dollars,” because all he had earned were measly Federal Reserve Notes. For the purposes of tax law, Rickman contended, one’s earnings must be either gold or silver coin as supposedly required by the Constitution.

Rickman bolstered his argument by pointing out that the Form 1040 uses the dollar sign ($) which, as everyone knows, is a symbol that refers exclusively to coins, not notes. The idea, it seems, is that the dollar sign comes from the old Spanish Dollar, or piece of eight, which was a silver coin at the time that the “dollar” was adopted as the unit of American currency. The federal court of appeals referred to this theory as “the height of absurdity” and upheld his conviction for tax evasion.

Procrastinators Unite!

Finally, if you really, really intended to file your tax return but just haven’t gotten around to it, you might be suffering from late-filing syndrome.

This was the argument made by Charles O’Byrne, a top aide to New York Governor David Paterson who admittedly failed to file tax returns for five years despite being highly-educated and having ample income.

Although it sounds like a bad joke, late-filing syndrome has been invoked by tax lawyers for years under various labels, including failure-to-file syndrome. According to experts, tax scofflaws who can show that they suffer from the syndrome stand a better chance of avoiding criminal sanctions.

A 1994 article in New York Law Journal co-authored by Elliot Silverman, a lawyer, and Dr. Stephen J. Coleman, a practicing psychiatrist, described the condition in detail, including the intriguing hypothesis that people who routinely fail to file taxes are “perfectionists.” Well, why not? A zero tax liability would satisfy most people’s idea of perfection.

If you feel a case of late filing syndrome coming over you, be sure to consult some combination of physician, lawyer, and CPA – and maybe a priest or rabbi for good measure.

Thank you for listening to Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful Life.  Be sure to check out the free GoToMyPC trial at GoToMyPC.com/podcast

Also, if you have dog – or are thinking of getting one – you’ll want to check out the latest addition to the Quick and Dirty Tips lineup: The Dog Trainer, who offers quick and dirty tips for teaching and caring for your four-legged friend. Listen to the Dog Trainer’s latest episode on iTunes.

You can send questions and comments to legal@quickanddirtytips.com or call them in to the voicemail line at 206-202-4LAW.  Please note that doing so will not create an attorney-client relationship and will be used for the purposes of this podcast only.


Comments (4) for Do I Really Have to Pay Taxes? |  Subscribe to Comment

Craig A. Says:
7/14/2009 4:47:35 PM
A co-worker of mine is convinced you are not required to pay taxes. Let me rephrase that... he pays taxes throughout the year and then gets 100% return when he files. Funny thing is... the IRS sends him a check for ALL federal income taxes he's paid! Not sure how he does it but he claims paying taxes is voluntary... not required. Once again he pays them but gets every dime back!
Patrick Says:
6/24/2009 8:41:20 PM
Yes, the dollar was derived from a standard silver piece. How is it that the Federal Reserve Note is related to the piece of silver? That's mostly rhetorical; I'm not asking for a monetary or exchange medium history of the United States. The point the Kansas Man you refer to was making is the fact that a FR Note is not, in fact, a dollar, or any promissory note standing in place of anything of value. It is, as I'm sure you and economics celebrities of the financial and economic world would agree, a physical representative of a "point" system. (That is, a "funny money" system, or "Rothbucks", for the more cynical of us.) I believe Gary was trying to point out that the operators of a system of a completely centrally controlled economic trade unit should not call said unit a "dollar" when it is clearly not based on any silver(or gold), and should not force, by influence and physical power of a government, the majority of trade within a country to be mediated with it. I believe Gary would consider the central control over the finances, therefore the time, therefore the lives of the people, of said country to be immoral. He might even be so outrageous as to call it slavery, collectivism, or some other word which would ordinarily cause most citizens of the US to take issue.
A Says:
4/30/2009 3:30:05 AM
According to Title 26 of the US Code only if you're a person who is a resident of the United States, whereas the term United States is defined as: (9) United States The term "United States" when used in a geographical sense includes only the States and the District of Columbia. (10) State The term "State" shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title. United States Person defined as: The term "United States person" means - (A) a citizen or resident of the United States, (B) a domestic partnership, (C) a domestic corporation, (D) any estate (other than a foreign estate, within the meaning of paragraph (31)), and (E) any trust if - (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust, and (ii) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
A Says:
4/30/2009 3:27:54 AM
According to Title 26 of the US Code only if you're a person who is a resident of the United States, whereas the term United States is defined as: (9) United States The term "United States" when used in a geographical sense includes only the States and the District of Columbia. (10) State The term "State" shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title. United States Person defined as: The term "United States person" means - (A) a citizen or resident of the United States, (B) a domestic partnership, (C) a domestic corporation, (D) any estate (other than a foreign estate, within the meaning of paragraph (31)), and (E) any trust if - (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust, and (ii) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required