Episode Transcript

Peeping Tom Laws
Episode 92: Monday, June 01, 2009

Hello, and welcome to Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful Life. I’m your host, Adam Freedman.

But first, your daily dose of legalese: This podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship with any listener. In other words, although I am a lawyer, I’m not your lawyer. In fact, we barely know each other. If you need personalized legal advice, contact an attorney in your community.

Is Being a Peeping Tom Illegal?

Today’s episode: Peeping Toms. Dan from New York City writes: “The other day I noticed a guy using binoculars to look while my girlfriend was changing. Is this legal? Are the laws different for viewing with the naked eye vs. using binoculars?”

Great question, Dan! The short answer is that in some states you could press charges under so-called “Peeping Tom” laws, but you’re probably out of luck in New York.

Before I go any further, I’m happy to tell you that this Podcast is brought to you by Go To Meeting.   If you’re like me – I can’t waste time driving or flying to all of my meetings.  That’s why I was excited when I discovered GoToMeeting Now I hold my meetings ONLINE! It’s perfect for sales presentations, training session, or product demos.  GoToMeetingbrought to you by CITRIX – is the easiest, most secure way to hold an ONLINE MEETING.  You can have ameeting up and running in seconds!  GoToMeeting can add hours to your week. Plus it’s just $49 a month and you can hold as many meetings as you want! You can try Go To Meeting FREE for 30 days. But you must visit GoToMeeting.com/podcast. That’s GoToMeeting.com/podcast for a FREE 30 day trial.

Back to the issue.

As every New Yorker knows, neighbors are supposed to keep to themselves. When they get nosy, it’s a major pain but, unfortunately, nosiness and even a certain degree of voyeurism may be legal unless your state or city has adopted a so-called Peeping Tom law.

What Are Peeping Tom Laws?

These laws get their name from the legend of Lady Godiva. As you no doubt recall, Lady Godiva rode naked through the streets of Coventry, England to protest high taxes. She asked the townspeople not to look at her in the nude but one man -- there’s always one -- a tailor named Tom, just couldn’t keep his eyes shut. The tailor, who became known as Peeping Tom, was struck blind, or dead depending on the version, the moment he saw her.

But anyway. Peeping Tom laws generally make it a crime to view and/or photograph or film a person without his or her consent. Peeping Tom statutes differ from state to state, but they usually require:

  1. That the victim did not realize he or she was being viewed;
  2. That the victim was fully or partially naked, and
  3. That the viewing took place at a place where the victim had a reasonable expectation of privacy.

What is a “Reasonable Expectation of Privacy”?

“Reasonable expectation of privacy” is a term borrowed from constitutional law, which requires that the police obtain a search warrant if they wish to conduct a search in a place where you would have a reasonable expectation of privacy.   There’s no exact definition of “reasonable expectation of privacy” but basically, private homes, dressing rooms, tanning booths, college dormitory rooms, and restrooms are the sorts of places protected. Public beaches, parks and swimming pools are not. So Dan, certainly you and your girlfriend ought to have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your apartment.

The Complexity of Peeping Tom Laws

However, as you will have noticed, Peeping Tom laws also tend to have a number of other specific conditions, like nudity and lack of consent. The reason for these conditions is to allow the Peeping Tom laws to pass constitutional scrutiny from the courts. The Constitution requires that criminal statutes be sufficiently definite and clear so as to give citizens advance notice of the conduct that is prohibited. In 1976, the North Carolina Supreme Court struck down a Peeping Tom statute as being too vague. That law stated: “Any person who shall peep secretly into any room occupied by a female person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined or imprisoned in the discretion of the court.” That decision and others like it led state legislatures to draft more exacting privacy laws.

One of the conditions adopted by New York and other states is that a Peeping Tom must be using a camera, videocam, or some other device to record a visual image of the victim. Mere looking doesn’t suffice to violate New York’s law.   A couple of years ago, a New York City Council member introduced a more stringent anti-voyeurism law, but so far it hasn’t gone anywhere. Having said that, Dan if you have any evidence that your neighbor has a hostile intent (versus just looking) you should of course report your suspicions to the police.

There are some states, such as Missouri, where the Peeping Tom law prohibits any secret viewing of a person without their consent, regardless of whether the perpetrator is using a camera, binoculars, or just the naked eye, so to speak.

Living in close quarters and the lack of a strong Peeping Tom law are disadvantages to living in Gotham. But Dan, as a fellow New Yorker, I wouldn’t urge you to leave the city. For the time being, just do like the rest of us, and pull down the shade. 

Thank you for listening to Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful Life.  Be sure to check out the free GoToMeeting offer today. It’s FREE for 30 days. Just visit GoToMeeting.com/podcast.

You can send questions and comments to legal@quickanddirtytips.com or call them in to the voicemail line at 206-202-4LAW.  Please note that doing so will not create an attorney-client relationship and will be used for the purposes of this podcast only.


Comments (1) for Peeping Tom Laws |  Subscribe to Comment

tyf Says:
6/20/2009 5:05:17 AM
The court ruling said the law criminalizing videotaping of nude people with out their permission was unconstitutional because it was too broad. The Supreme Court pretty much provided a roadmap to fixing the law as they struck it down. Two things need to be addressed - narrowing scope of the law to cover any place where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy , and the issue of visual reproductions of nudity. Pictures of Michaelangelo's David would have been illegal under the old law. Revising that language would allow artistic expression while still protecting the privacy rights of people when they undress in their homes.Some of the taken pictures are during hometown vacationing.

Add Comment

 *
 *
 *
  Image to deter spam submissions
  To deter spam submissions, please type the letters from the image into the box below:
 *
 
  Fields marked with "*" are required